A passionate Mexican History Teacher. Willing to integrate technology as tool in my daily routine but always promote love for books and libraries.
lunes, 30 de abril de 2012
Pre assinment 6: Bill Rankin's Mobile Learning presentation
sábado, 3 de marzo de 2012
Educational TED Talk
We Can Recycle Plastic, and Educational TED Talk
What is the purpose of this media/information resource?
The purpose of this video is to educate the general population of the possibility of recycling discarded plastic from land fills and garbage dumps into plastic pellets to be able to produce new plastic products. Resulting in a 80 - 90% in reduction of energy use, as well as, reduction in cost.
How is this produced?
It is a live conference by the Mike Billings that was recorded in Austria. He used a power point to support his points
Who created it?
Mike Biddle, “the plastic man” Created the presentation, but TED recorded the talk and and shares it with viewers through their website..
Who is the intended audience? How do you know?
European World at large, specifically the European market where there is electronic waste regulation exists, where as in the United Stated it doesn’t not. This regulation allows his company to access a stream of materials to exploit.
We know this because of his commentary directly related to this point in his actual talk (“here in Europe...not in place in the U.S”. Additionally, looking at Mike’s biography which is included on the TED website, this is also clarified - Mike has plants in Austria and India, with plans to build more in Europe due to wast regulations already in place in Europe that support this project.
What is the main message?
Plastic can be wisely recycled with increased savings, lower energy use and decreased negative effect on human health. Biddle’s intention is to let Americans and Europeans (really, the world) know that plastic is even more valuable than metal can be, and that is possible to recycle it instead of down-cycling, which only leads to more waste (not a real solution). He wants to change the way people perceive plastic and how we can consume it wisely in their daily lives
Who benefits and what do they gain?
Ideally, everyone would benefit because it would reduce the amount of chemicals released into the air that increases global warming and affects the human health. It reduces the use of energy, which is energy savings for the world and its economically viable.
What would have been my information needs that would have led me to this video?
I am concerned about the overuse for plastic consumtion and our throw away attitude with our students who don’t understand the negative effects on the environment of plastic in our dumps and landfills. We want to show them there is a solution a and they can be a “part of it.”
How would I understand, organize and assess the information found?
We trust the source, TED is a “non-profit educational devoted to ideas worth spreading.” “There mission is to spread ideas that will change peoples attitudes and ideas. They offer free knowledge from inspired thinkers and people who have created positive change in the world.” (Ted.com) Speakers on TED are recognized industry and world-issue leaders providing solutions and insight on their specialty.
Identify and explain the Big6 steps you're applying in this activity.
b). Information Seeking Strategies.- Browsing in ted.com and identifying some video that resonated with our interests
c). Location and Access.- We watched the review of three Ted videos and decided on the one that looked better and more suitable for us.
d).Use of Information.- Hear the video and watch it carefully. Maybe even watching it twice.
e). Synthesis.- This information can be shown to ASF students in relation to our own plastic recycling efforts and to show them that there are leading who are looking for solutions to problems, like the problem of recycling plastic. This also shows them that they can be part of the solution of plastic recycling in their own country.
f). Evaluation.- How we processed the information and did we do a good job. Did we find something relevant to our teaching? Yes, we found something that is relevant to our teaching and to our school. We were excited to find this video and learn of Mike Biddle’s success with this patented process that solves the plastic problem that is burying our world. We are so excited to share this with our students!
miércoles, 29 de febrero de 2012
Adapting a Unit Plan
martes, 28 de febrero de 2012
Webquest - QR Code Rally

Fun! Working in teams! Having the same goal! Competition! Challenge!
Google vs. MS Database
We started by using exactly the same key words either in the MS database (Grolier) and in Google, and examining only the first top five that appeared in both sources we concluded that in this specific topic about students with learning disabilities Grolier database was not the best path to look for this information. However, we believe it would be very different if the topic under History or Geography. On the other hand, Google showed us a couple of interesting articles from very reliable sources such as Scholastic.com and a magazine from the University of North Carolina. The design on both sites were equally attractive. The technical elements found in both were the same, both had image links. Credibility was seen as valid in both databases, however, one could find much more information that is valid under Google because it offers many more sources from important universities and researchers. Based on the fact that our students continuously use Google, we really need to encourage teaching and learning information literacy skills such as using the proper database from our libraries and teach students how to find and discern valid information from Google. We cannot pretend they will stop using Google nor we cannot assume that they know how to identify valid and credible information.
domingo, 26 de febrero de 2012
Information Literacy and Media Literacy
Media literacy (ML) and information literacy (IL) practically look the same, it is not easy to observe the difference. For from what I’ve learn during these days and based on the UNESCO reading, IL is the ability of the individual to seek, evaluate and make ethical use of the information, is an acquired capacity to understand different sources that could include ML. In the other hand ML in the way the individual is immerse in a continuous exposure of information, but if “processed” under the umbrella of IL the individual can as well evaluate and make ethical use of it.
IL is an objective view and ML is the way the individual process it through it different sources, is more focused in the self-expression and the personal engagement to it so it would be more subjective. ML must consider and discern the information based on the source it comes from. IL is broader, is kind of an approach to information regardless the impact or relationship of the source to the individual.
Ultimately both of them are based and focused in the whole process of looking for, processes and communication information and the ethical use if it is also common for both of them.
